Quantcast Advantages and Disadvantages of the Leadership Styles

Share on Google+Share on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on DiggShare on Stumble Upon
Custom Search
 
  
 
You can adapt the six different leadership styles (coercer, authoritarian, affiliator, demo- cratic,   pacesetter,    and  coach)  to  meet  the requirements of different situations. COERCER.  —In this style of leadership, subordinates are expected to do the job the way the leader tells them to do it. Coercer leaders provide clear directions by telling subordinates what to do and how to do it. They don’t listen to the subordinates nor permit much subordinate input. They expect immediate compliance and obedience to orders, and they control the jobs very tightly. This style of leadership requires many detailed reports on the job, including progress and problems with the job. Coercer leaders give more negative and personalized feedback than positive feedback and frequently resort to name calling to accomplish the job. They motivate their subor- dinates by threats of discipline or punishment. AUTHORITARIAN. —Authoritarian leaders are firm but fair. They tactfully provide clear direction but leave no doubt about what is expected or who makes the final decisions. They solicit some input from subordinates on how to do the job and ways to make the job easier. Authoritarian leaders see their influence as a key part of their job. They persuade subordinates to do the job by explaining the “whys” behind decisions. They monitor all jobs closely and provide negative and positive feedback to their subordinates. AFFILIATOR. —In this leadership style the people are the leader’s first concern. Affiliator leaders consider concern for subordinates and personal popularity as the most important aspect of their job. They don’t provide clear direction, standards, or goals. They provide for job security and fringe benefits to keep their subordinates happy. Affiliators avoid conflicts that might cause hard feelings. They reward personal characteristics rather than job performance, and they rarely punish subordinates. DEMOCRATIC.  —This style of leadership relies on participation of the group. Democratic leaders believe subordinates should take part in the decision-making process. They base decisions on the consensus of opinion of the entire group. They consider specific direction and close super- vision unnecessary in completing the job when trust has been established. They frequently hold meetings  and  listen  to  their  subordinates. Democratic  leaders  usually  reward  average performance and rarely give negative feedback or punishment. PACESETTER. —Pacesetter leaders would rather  do  the  job  themselves.  They  set  high standards, and they lead by example. They are loners. They expect self-direction of themselves and others. Pacesetter leaders have trouble delegating because they believe they can do the job much better than their subordinates. They become coercive when their subordinates have difficulty or when things go wrong. Pacesetter leaders don’t develop subordinates because they are continually taking away the subordinates’ responsibility and exerting their own authority. COACH. —In the coach style of leadership, leaders are concerned with the development of their subordinates. They are concerned with high standards but have trouble communicating these high standards to subordinates. Coach leaders see their  job  as  developing  and  improving  the performance of their subordinates. They direct by having subordinates set their own goals. They get their workers to develop plans and identify solutions instead of giving them clear, concise instructions on what to do and how to do it. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Leadership Styles Each of the six leadership styles has advantages and disadvantages. Usually a good leader is a combination of several of these styles. You must tailor your personal leadership style to fit each situation. The coercer style is especially effective during a wartime situation when the command is in combat  or  under  fire.  However,  this  style  of leadership can have some negative effects if the command, work center, or individual is performing at a high rate of efficiency. Subordinates will not respond well to the repeated use of threats during normal situations. You might find the authoritarian leadership style useful when seeking information on a particular situation or before inspections. However, it is normally not a good style to use in personal counseling sessions. This leadership style doesn’t allow enough flexibility to provide alternative solutions  to  subordinates’  personal  problems. Using this style by jumping in and taking over in situations when you have technically competent workers is counterproductive. 3-16



Military News
Records, photos of famed U.S. WWII bombers go online
Thousands of feet above the Pacific Ocean, the bullets were...
militarytimes.com
Texan who faked military past guilty in guns case
A Texas convicted felon who faked being an Army Ranger...
militarytimes.com
U.S.-led forces bomb IS targets near Turkey
Activists say the U.S.-led coalition has struck targets of the...
militarytimes.com
Ex-FBI agent pleads guilty in Afghan scheme
A former FBI agent pleaded guilty Monday to charges that...
militarytimes.com
Afghanistan, U.S. sign long-awaited security pact
Afghanistan and the United States have signed a long-awaited security...
militarytimes.com
Pentagon procedures stall Gitmo closure
The transfer of prisoners out of Guantanamo Bay has ground...
militarytimes.com
Report: White House intruder made it far past front door
A man who scaled a White House fence this month...
militarytimes.com
Vietnam veteran receives Silver Star 48 years later
A Vietnam War veteran received the Silver Star Sunday for...
militarytimes.com
McCain: Ground troops needed to fight ISIL
Americans would support sending more U.S. troops to fight the...
militarytimes.com
Obama efforts to oust Assad pushed to back burner
By President Obama's own admission, U.S. efforts to oust Syrian...
militarytimes.com
Interview: Leno on USO, entertaining troops and his 'tank car'
It would be tough to script a better opening line...
militarytimes.com
Delay vote on authorizing airstrikes, key GOP lawmaker says
By the time Congress decides whether it wants to vote...
militarytimes.com
Administration seeks to close Gitmo hearing
The Obama administration is seeking to close a court hearing...
militarytimes.com
Germany unable to meet NATO readiness target
Germany's military is unable to meet its medium-term readiness target...
militarytimes.com
Air Force takes the lead on airstrikes against Islamic State
The Air Force has flown a large majority of all...
militarytimes.com
Battle against Islamic State creates new alliances
On a recent evening, two of Jordan's top pro-al-Qaida ideologues...
militarytimes.com
U.S. to keep 10,000 troops in Afghanistan
A top aide to President Obama said Monday that the...
militarytimes.com
New crisis response unit to be based in Kuwait
The Marine Corps is preparing to deploy about 2,100 grunts...
militarytimes.com
U.S. envoy says no talks with North Korea in sight
Washington believes that North Korea is increasingly unwilling to live...
militarytimes.com
 


Privacy Statement - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

comments powered by Disqus

Integrated Publishing, Inc.
9438 US Hwy 19N #311 Port Richey, FL 34668

Phone For Parts Inquiries: (727) 755-3260
Google +