Quantcast Advantages and Disadvantages of the Leadership Styles

Share on Google+Share on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare on DiggShare on Stumble Upon
Custom Search
 
  
 
You can adapt the six different leadership styles (coercer, authoritarian, affiliator, demo- cratic,   pacesetter,    and  coach)  to  meet  the requirements of different situations. COERCER.  —In this style of leadership, subordinates are expected to do the job the way the leader tells them to do it. Coercer leaders provide clear directions by telling subordinates what to do and how to do it. They don’t listen to the subordinates nor permit much subordinate input. They expect immediate compliance and obedience to orders, and they control the jobs very tightly. This style of leadership requires many detailed reports on the job, including progress and problems with the job. Coercer leaders give more negative and personalized feedback than positive feedback and frequently resort to name calling to accomplish the job. They motivate their subor- dinates by threats of discipline or punishment. AUTHORITARIAN. —Authoritarian leaders are firm but fair. They tactfully provide clear direction but leave no doubt about what is expected or who makes the final decisions. They solicit some input from subordinates on how to do the job and ways to make the job easier. Authoritarian leaders see their influence as a key part of their job. They persuade subordinates to do the job by explaining the “whys” behind decisions. They monitor all jobs closely and provide negative and positive feedback to their subordinates. AFFILIATOR. —In this leadership style the people are the leader’s first concern. Affiliator leaders consider concern for subordinates and personal popularity as the most important aspect of their job. They don’t provide clear direction, standards, or goals. They provide for job security and fringe benefits to keep their subordinates happy. Affiliators avoid conflicts that might cause hard feelings. They reward personal characteristics rather than job performance, and they rarely punish subordinates. DEMOCRATIC.  —This style of leadership relies on participation of the group. Democratic leaders believe subordinates should take part in the decision-making process. They base decisions on the consensus of opinion of the entire group. They consider specific direction and close super- vision unnecessary in completing the job when trust has been established. They frequently hold meetings  and  listen  to  their  subordinates. Democratic  leaders  usually  reward  average performance and rarely give negative feedback or punishment. PACESETTER. —Pacesetter leaders would rather  do  the  job  themselves.  They  set  high standards, and they lead by example. They are loners. They expect self-direction of themselves and others. Pacesetter leaders have trouble delegating because they believe they can do the job much better than their subordinates. They become coercive when their subordinates have difficulty or when things go wrong. Pacesetter leaders don’t develop subordinates because they are continually taking away the subordinates’ responsibility and exerting their own authority. COACH. —In the coach style of leadership, leaders are concerned with the development of their subordinates. They are concerned with high standards but have trouble communicating these high standards to subordinates. Coach leaders see their  job  as  developing  and  improving  the performance of their subordinates. They direct by having subordinates set their own goals. They get their workers to develop plans and identify solutions instead of giving them clear, concise instructions on what to do and how to do it. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Leadership Styles Each of the six leadership styles has advantages and disadvantages. Usually a good leader is a combination of several of these styles. You must tailor your personal leadership style to fit each situation. The coercer style is especially effective during a wartime situation when the command is in combat  or  under  fire.  However,  this  style  of leadership can have some negative effects if the command, work center, or individual is performing at a high rate of efficiency. Subordinates will not respond well to the repeated use of threats during normal situations. You might find the authoritarian leadership style useful when seeking information on a particular situation or before inspections. However, it is normally not a good style to use in personal counseling sessions. This leadership style doesn’t allow enough flexibility to provide alternative solutions  to  subordinates’  personal  problems. Using this style by jumping in and taking over in situations when you have technically competent workers is counterproductive. 3-16



Military News
Paper: Files allege misconduct within Alaska Guard
Investigative files show years of alleged sexual and other misconduct...
militarytimes.com
Financial help possible for families of troops deployed on Ebola mission
Families of troops deployed to West Africa on the Ebola...
militarytimes.com
Sweden's hunt for submarine hunt sends Cold War chill across Baltic
Sweden's biggest submarine hunt since the dying days of the...
militarytimes.com
Philippine leader: Murder case won't harm U.S. ties
Philippine President Benigno Aquino III said Monday that a murder...
militarytimes.com
Fewer veterans running for congressional office
The number of veterans in Congress has been steadily dropping...
militarytimes.com
U.S. advisory mission in Iraq remains limited in scope and impact
More than one month after President Obama ordered U.S. troops...
militarytimes.com
Slain Guardsman and teacher posthumously awarded 2 medals
A Nevada teacher killed by a 12-year-old student in a...
militarytimes.com
Kerry: 'Irresponsible' not to aid Kurds against IS
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday the Obama...
militarytimes.com
Attacks on Afghan checkpoints kill 4 troops
Officials say insurgents have attacked several army checkpoints in eastern...
militarytimes.com
Top U.S. commander in Ebola fight sees progress
The first of 17 U.S.-built Ebola treatment centers in West...
militarytimes.com
After arms drop, U.S. coalition strikes IS
Syrian activists say the U.S.-led coalition has launched new airstrikes...
militarytimes.com
CDC to revise Ebola protocol; military readies medical team
Revised guidance for health care workers treating Ebola patients will...
militarytimes.com
These federal contractors are hiring vets now
Companies that do business with the federal government employ a...
militarytimes.com
Future USS Detroit christened in Wisconsin
The Navy has christened a warship named after Michigan's largest...
militarytimes.com
Air Force strike chief urges B-52 engine replacement
The head of U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command wants...
militarytimes.com
Spain gives U.S. go-ahead to use bases against Ebola
Spain has agreed to allow the U.S. to use two...
militarytimes.com
Sweden in 3rd day of search for suspected submarine
The Swedish military's search for evidence of suspected undersea activity...
militarytimes.com
Turkey would oppose U.S. arms transfers to Kurds
Turkey would not agree to any U.S....
militarytimes.com
Obama switches gears, confronting Ebola head on
President Obama delayed acting on immigration and an attorney general...
militarytimes.com
 


Privacy Statement - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

comments powered by Disqus

Integrated Publishing, Inc.
9438 US Hwy 19N #311 Port Richey, FL 34668

Phone For Parts Inquiries: (727) 755-3260
Google +